Reading & Reacting: Rethinking Schools – The Trouble with the Common Core

From Rethinking Schools – Editorial: The Trouble with the Common Core

This editorial does an excellent job of spelling out the need for resistance to many of the edreform efforts that are currently gaining ground, represented principally by the Common Core.

I am glad that they began with some positive concessions, because there are some quality aspects to the Common Core. In fact, I would say that the differences between the CCSS and the pre-existing Massachusetts frameworks not so great as some would claim, at least at the high school level. Many of the standards are the same or nearly so. There is a fundamental paradigm shift in the pointed emphasis on non-fiction reading, but overall many of the standards are quite similar. Yet, as this editorial implies that is not necessarily a good thing either.

Tracing the CCSS lineage back through No Child Left Behind, reveals some key flaws. Doubling down on rewards and punishments through high stakes testing that determines financial incentives has proven problematic at best and, in some cases, disastrous at worst. Moreover, those kinds motivational efforts are prove to be severely flawed in a lot of the market-driven business world too.

More than anything, I wish people would just recognize the dubious way the current edreforms, like the Common Core, have been brought into being. The Common Core was not developed by educators that would ever be charged with using them. Corporate money funded a top-down initiative, via the National Governors Association. That is the closest it has ever been to being a state effort. These are all facts that anyone who picked up a copy of them and read the front matter could find out for themselves.

Add to that the urge to link all the testing to teacher evaluations, when nearly every reliable assessment expert says this is incongruous, only adds danger to the mix. If the tests are designed to measure student performance, which is truly a debatable point of contention in the aftermath of New York State, then that is their purpose. Using a measure for height does not render good results when trying to measure for weight.

Ultimately, what this editorial points out is the sheer lack of honesty, research, understanding, transparency, democracy, and public interest that the Common Core presents to us all.


Image: iPad

posted via haaslearning.tumblr.com
and flipped to Teaching Today
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Reading & Reacting: Rethinking Schools – The Trouble with the Common Core

  1. gillis

    So many of the things we feared with the creation of the common core standards are now beginning to bear fruit. Thank you for sharing this Fred. I’m trying to remain cautiously optimistic, but the caution seems forefront to the optimism today.

    Reply
    1. Fred Haas - @akh003 Post author

      Kathleen:

      What a joy to hear from you. Sadly, a lot of fears are coming true. It is hard to believe it has been so long since we were up to our armpits in Common Core related stuff, although I always felt we spent more of our time wrestling with the odd curriculum model. Still, I miss the crew.

      Thanks again for stopping by the site,

      Fred

      Reply

So what do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s